Mail Archives: cygwin/2005/10/06/11:00:31
On Thu, Oct 06, 2005 at 05:39:35PM +0300, Pavel Tsekov wrote:
>On Thu, 6 Oct 2005, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>
>> Did you happen to notice when the age of the message to which you're
>> responding? Dave figured out the problem subsequent to sending the
>> above. It was due to some object files not getting rebuilt after a
>> change to cygtls.h.
>
>Yes. When I saw the error message I remembered that I've seen it on
>the mailing list already. So, I used the search engine to find on
>which date the message was posted and replied ot that post.
>
>It might be a different problem but the message is the same.
It *is* a different problem.
>And this is with a clean build of the dll from yesterday and a clean
>build of the software from today. Here is a backtrace (just for the
>record):
>
>(gdb) bt
>#0 sigismember (set=0x162f090, sig=31) at
>../../../../src/winsup/cygwin/signal.cc:429
>#1 0x61017710 in sigpacket::process (this=0x6113b3ec) at
>../../../../src/winsup/cygwin/exceptions.cc:1072
>#2 0x61092b18 in wait_sig () at
>../../../../src/winsup/cygwin/sigproc.cc:1128
>#3 0x610033ef in cygthread::stub (arg=0xa2eff0) at
>../../../../src/winsup/cygwin/cygthread.cc:73
>#4 0x00000f94 in ?? ()
>#5 0x00000000 in ?? () from
>
>In frame 0 'set' is pointing at invalid memory - I am trying to determine
>why.
Some thread is sending a signal 31 (SIGUSR1). Which thread is doing this?
cgf
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
- Raw text -