Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From:	Shankar Unni <shankarunni AT netscape DOT net>
Subject:	Re: popularity-contest for Cygwin?
Date:	Fri, 30 Sep 2005 12:56:23 -0700
Lines:	16
Message-ID:	<dhk597$8qf$1@sea.gmane.org>
References:	<jinqj1ll2dnc1d2u18l373o2fjdbohcglt AT 4ax DOT com> <Pine DOT GSO DOT 4 DOT 63 DOT 0509301330030 DOT 25428 AT slinky DOT cs DOT nyu DOT edu>
Mime-Version:	1.0
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8b4) Gecko/20050908 Thunderbird/1.4 Mnenhy/0.7.2.0
In-Reply-To:	<Pine.GSO.4.63.0509301330030.25428@slinky.cs.nyu.edu>
X-IsSubscribed:	yes

Igor Pechtchanski wrote:

> We already have such a tool.  It's called "cygcheck".  When people post
> their cygcheck output to the list, it also contains the list of packages
> they installed.

But not what they are *using*, which seems to be the big thing in 
popularity-contest.

Given that disks are cheap these days, and time is expensive, and 
setup.exe is (as always :-) ) mind-numbing, most users I know just 
install "All" from the top level, always.  Saves a lot of setup-package 
searching later..

But ah, if we could figure out which packages are being *used*, that 
would be fantastic..


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -