delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: cygwin/2005/09/29/10:44:20

Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 10:43:59 -0400 (EDT)
From: Igor Pechtchanski <pechtcha AT cs DOT nyu DOT edu>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
To: Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton <lkcl AT lkcl DOT net>
cc: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: setup.exe 2.510.2.2, 2.427 and 2.457 consistently failing, on win2000, sp4
In-Reply-To: <20050929143349.GR12018@lkcl.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.63.0509291041000.2902@slinky.cs.nyu.edu>
References: <20050926225151 DOT GD11050 AT lkcl DOT net> <Pine DOT GSO DOT 4 DOT 63 DOT 0509262037150 DOT 19067 AT slinky DOT cs DOT nyu DOT edu> <20050927123423 DOT GJ11050 AT lkcl DOT net> <Pine DOT GSO DOT 4 DOT 63 DOT 0509270957030 DOT 21541 AT slinky DOT cs DOT nyu DOT edu> <20050927142202 DOT GE24608 AT lkcl DOT net> <Pine DOT GSO DOT 4 DOT 63 DOT 0509272136010 DOT 21541 AT slinky DOT cs DOT nyu DOT edu> <20050929100855 DOT GG12018 AT lkcl DOT net> <Pine DOT GSO DOT 4 DOT 63 DOT 0509291018110 DOT 2902 AT slinky DOT cs DOT nyu DOT edu> <20050929143349 DOT GR12018 AT lkcl DOT net>
MIME-Version: 1.0

On Thu, 29 Sep 2005, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:

> On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 10:19:58AM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
>
> > >  http://hands.com/~lkcl/cygwin
> >
> > Umm, doesn't look like you actually tried to install anything...  Did you
> > simply switch to partial view and then cancel?
>
>  no - i didn't!!
>
>  it's a minimum install which i downloaded earlier.

Hmm, weird.

>  btw - when it says the files aren't there (fopen failed) it's because
>  the files _aren't_ there!!
>
>  should they be?

Yes.

>  should they have been created?

Yes, but possibly after a successful install.  I just noticed the way the
install database is managed in setup, and it's ghastly.  I'll see if I can
write something more sensible when I get a round tuit.

>  maybe this is something as weird as fopen() with create flags being
>  ignored...

How are your permissions on c:\cygwin and c:\cygwin\etc?

> > It would be interesting to see what the log looks like for a real
> > install -- download from internet, etc.
>
>  that's going to hammer my network for an hour: any suggestions on
>  minimum package (singular!) which will get info into the logs?

There's no single package -- many things in the Base category are
inter-dependent.  However, if you switch back to the original mirror you
used to download the packages, setup won't re-download stuff it already
has in the cache.
HTH,
	Igor
-- 
				http://cs.nyu.edu/~pechtcha/
      |\      _,,,---,,_		pechtcha AT cs DOT nyu DOT edu
ZZZzz /,`.-'`'    -.  ;-;;,_		igor AT watson DOT ibm DOT com
     |,4-  ) )-,_. ,\ (  `'-'		Igor Pechtchanski, Ph.D.
    '---''(_/--'  `-'\_) fL	a.k.a JaguaR-R-R-r-r-r-.-.-.  Meow!

If there's any real truth it's that the entire multidimensional infinity
of the Universe is almost certainly being run by a bunch of maniacs. /DA

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019