Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From:	"Dave Korn" <dave DOT korn AT artimi DOT com>
To:	<cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject:	RE: stripping snapshots
Date:	Tue, 20 Sep 2005 11:11:13 +0100
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<432FBBC5.6010509@lapo.it>
Message-ID:	<SERRANOolkDTM9wGmAf000000f2@SERRANO.CAM.ARTIMI.COM>

----Original Message----
>From: Lapo Luchini
>Sent: 20 September 2005 08:36

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote:
>> Could snapshots be provided this way instead or in addition to with
>> unstripped executables?
> 
> But wouldn't that remove any debugging info?
> (which is kinda needed, if a snapshot has got some bugs)
> 


  And besides, it's _really_ easy to strip them yourself:

tar -tjf cygwin-inst-20050920.tar.bz2 | grep \.exe | xargs strip



    cheers,
      DaveK
-- 
Can't think of a witty .sigline today....


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -