Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From:	"Dave Korn" <dave DOT korn AT artimi DOT com>
To:	<cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject:	RE: Bug in tcltk's glob
Date:	Fri, 16 Sep 2005 18:18:09 +0100
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<dges4m$n55$1@sea.gmane.org>
Message-ID:	<SERRANOZ9FTNtUhQ6Gy00000061@SERRANO.CAM.ARTIMI.COM>

----Original Message----
>From: Sebastian Schuberth
>Sent: 16 September 2005 17:33

>>> I don't think there is any need to patch tcltk, as I believe the bug has
>>> already been fixed in more recent versions than the one supplied with
>>> Cygwin. So a simple recompile for Cygwin should do. Unfortunately, I
>>> have neither the time nor expertise to do so.
>> 
>>   Nor do you have sufficient good manners to persuade anyone else to do
>> so on your behalf.  So I guess you're SOL then, aren't you?
> 
> If you're refering to my mistake to contact Chris directly, I'm sorry
> for that, I didn't read his mail on cygwin.applications to the bottom.
> 
> That said, I was not surprised to get a canned response, it was just
> fair. You seem a little harsh with your judgement, Dave.


<shrugs>  It's entirely possible I am.  Then again, it's entirely possible
you should have dropped the matter after the first reply, rather than
continuing to importune.  So it goes.  Have a nice weekend, anyway!


    cheers,
      DaveK
-- 
Can't think of a witty .sigline today....


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -