Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Tue, 13 Sep 2005 23:50:13 -0400
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf-no-personal-reply-please AT cygwin DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Bug found, new snapshot generated so still - testers needed prior to 1.5.19 release
Message-ID:	<20050914035013.GB30032@trixie.casa.cgf.cx>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<20050912222727 DOT GA24998 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <4326CC52 DOT 7030708 AT byu DOT net> <20050913221402 DOT GA24536 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <43279C36 DOT 1070405 AT byu DOT net>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<43279C36.1070405@byu.net>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.5.8i

On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 09:42:46PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
>True, 1.5.18 had the same problem, but 1.5.17 did not.  So it just depends
>on how far back you were looking before calling it a regression :)

Does this ring a bell?

"If you think you've found an error, please indicate whether this is a
regression from 1.5.18."

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -