Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From:	zzapper <david AT tvis DOT co DOT uk>
Subject:	Re: xargs still nok?
Date:	Thu, 08 Sep 2005 16:16:32 +0100
Lines:	16
Message-ID:	<74l0i15a1usdmuifhft3q8l7kgmqrkq152@4ax.com>
References:	<090820051450 DOT 28740 DOT 43204FBE00096E3A0000704422073007930A050E040D0C079D0A AT comcast DOT net>
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-IsSubscribed:	yes

On Thu, 08 Sep 2005 14:50:38 +0000,  wrote:

>> 
thnx everybody for xargs tutorial (bit of a strange beast xargs!).
Here's the crux of the matter ISFAIUI

if you want to pipe the o/p of find then xargs will 'regulate' the flow of filenames

if you use the -exec method that is inherently on a per file basis so does not require xargs but
with a speed penalty for a large number of files


-- 
zzapper
Success for Techies and Vim,Zsh tips
http://SuccessTheory.com/


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -