Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From:	Harry Putnam <reader AT newsguy DOT com>
Subject:	Re: Emacs from cygwin in X mode with no X running
Date:	Fri, 26 Aug 2005 10:04:47 -0500
Lines:	17
Message-ID:	<87br3khh80.fsf@newsguy.com>
References:	<87pss1gc5g DOT fsf AT newsguy DOT com> <f5bpss0onz7 DOT fsf AT erasmus DOT inf DOT ed DOT ac DOT uk>
Mime-Version:	1.0
User-Agent:	Gnus/5.110003 (No Gnus v0.3) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux)
X-IsSubscribed:	yes

ht AT inf DOT ed DOT ac DOT uk (Henry S. Thompson) writes:
[...]

> This can be done easily with XEmacs.  You can get an only slightly
> stale version (21.4.13) straight out of the box from XEmacs.org [1]
> (pick 'native windows').
>
> Or you can compile your own 21.4.17 from source, but this is _not_ a
> 'straight-out-of-the-box' exercise.  If you try this and have trouble,
> I'll try to dig out my config.status and other notes from the last
> time I made it all work.  I _think_ the rebase problems (google
> cygwin+xemacs+rebase) have disappeared, but I may be wrong.

Very kind of you to offer.  However I'm a confirmed fsf emacs user.
Tried Xemacs several times but always returned to fsf emacs.

Its been my tool of choice for  4-6 yrs now.


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -