Mail Archives: cygwin/2005/08/19/15:46:07
On Fri, Aug 19, 2005 at 07:27:55PM +0000, Eric Blake wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2005 at 03:01:19PM -0400, Poor Yorick wrote:
>> >from reading the bash man pages, I would have thought the -n and -z were
>> >mutually exclusive. Therefore I don't understand this result:
>> >
>> >~>$ [ -n $(which nonexisingfilename 2>/dev/null) ] && [ -z $(which
>> >nonexistingfilename 2&>/dev/null) ] && echo hello
>> >hello
>> >~>$
>> >
>> >can anyone help explain this?
>>
>> This defaults to
>>
>> [ -n ] && [ -z ] && echo hello
>>
>> I would have expected a syntax error in that case.
>
>Nope. POSIX requires that when there is one argument, it evaluates
>to true if it is not empty.
Thanks for the clarification.
>Neither -n nor -z is empty, so they are both true. Remember, if there
>are no quotes around a word, it is subject to field splitting, such
>that an empty string disappears from the argument list altogether, and
>you are only giving one argument to [.
Er, yeah. That's what I meant when I said:
"This defaults to:
[ -n ] ..." ?
and then mentioned that the argument had to be quoted.
cgf
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
- Raw text -