delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: cygwin/2005/08/15/23:01:04

Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2005 23:00:33 -0400 (EDT)
From: Igor Pechtchanski <pechtcha AT cs DOT nyu DOT edu>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
To: Herb Martin <HerbM AT learnquick DOT com>
cc: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: RE: Another (differently) broken man on CygWin 1.5.8
In-Reply-To: <EIL92G9-0003B0-56@mail2.learnquick.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.61.0508152258350.9560@slinky.cs.nyu.edu>
References: <EIL92G9-0003B0-56 AT mail2 DOT learnquick DOT com>
MIME-Version: 1.0

On Mon, 15 Aug 2005, Herb Martin wrote:

> > >         cygcheck can show a version when the program is not
> > >                 even there (either not installed or missing)
> >
> > Why do you say that the Cygwin man was not installed?  From
> > everything you've posted it was installed just fine, but your
> > other version of man was found first in the path.
>
> No, it wasnt' THERE.  There was no man.exe AND the "other man" was LATER
> on the path even had there been such a file.

"cygcheck -cv man" should have shown that the "man" package was
incomplete, and listed the files that it thought were missing.

> I used setup and re-installed it.  The other item, still later on the
> path was being picked up. So I deleted the other man, and then bash
> complained that the deleted file was missing even though the "right one"
> is in /usr/bin and the "wrong one" is gone.

'which man'?  'type -a man'?

> I still haven't found an encantation for "hash" (or the proper command)
> so temporarily I put a link in the "wrong location" to point to the
> correct man.exe.

It should be "hash -t man man.exe" (or "hash -t man{,.exe}")...
	Igor
-- 
				http://cs.nyu.edu/~pechtcha/
      |\      _,,,---,,_		pechtcha AT cs DOT nyu DOT edu
ZZZzz /,`.-'`'    -.  ;-;;,_		igor AT watson DOT ibm DOT com
     |,4-  ) )-,_. ,\ (  `'-'		Igor Pechtchanski, Ph.D.
    '---''(_/--'  `-'\_) fL	a.k.a JaguaR-R-R-r-r-r-.-.-.  Meow!

If there's any real truth it's that the entire multidimensional infinity
of the Universe is almost certainly being run by a bunch of maniacs. /DA

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019