Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Fri, 12 Aug 2005 10:01:36 +0200
From:	Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: findutils vs. /proc/registry
Message-ID:	<20050812080136.GL2816@calimero.vinschen.de>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<42F75183 DOT 6010804 AT byu DOT net> <20050808133156 DOT GB14783 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20050808153351 DOT GE14783 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <42FC1729 DOT 2070904 AT byu DOT net>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<42FC1729.2070904@byu.net>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.4.2i

On Aug 11 21:27, Eric Blake wrote:
>   (Even though cygwin just added fts to
> the snapshots, find still uses the gnulib version instead because it
> claims "the GNU libc and NetBSD versions have bugs and/or unnecessary
> limitations.")

The Cygwin version is from FreeBSD, which in turn is from OpenBSD.

I saw that coreutils also does not even ask for fts(3) being available
on the target system, but du(1) is easily patchable, so I used that for
testing our new fts().


Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Project Co-Leader          mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat, Inc.

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -