| delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Richard M. Stallman wrote: > When GC encounters a fatal inconsistency in the Emacs data structures, > it is generally unsafe to say anything, since that could easily cause > a nested fatal signal. > > It would also not be very useful, since any info we could put into > such an error message could be quickly discovered by a little > investigation with a debugger. I have to disgree with that, it's the instant gut ueber-programmer reaction to such problems. Currently the user just gets an exiting emacs, leaving me with no clue as to why emacs exited. I then have to provide instructions to the user as to how to run the $*&$%#!!! debugger to help me figure out what happened. The debugger that he may or may not have installed, and may or may not even be ABLE to install. A simple last-ditch printf that says "corruption detected during garbage collection, see you later" would be a much easier way to get an initial handle on what the heck the problem is. As it was, without any message, my initial suspicion was a SEGV or similar, which would be much more likely to be a Cygwin problem than an emacs problem. -- Joe Buehler -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
| webmaster | delorie software privacy |
| Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |