delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: cygwin/2005/08/08/07:36:50

Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID: <42F743BD.3060904@spirentcom.com>
Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2005 07:36:29 -0400
X-Sybari-Trust: 7149e69c a230148a e8e36281 0000013d
From: Joe Buehler <jbuehler AT spirentcom DOT com>
Reply-To: jbuehler AT spirentcom DOT com
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Windows/20050716)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ehud AT unix DOT mvs DOT co DOT il
CC: emacs_user AT hotmail DOT com, emacs-pretest-bug AT gnu DOT org, emacs-devel AT gnu DOT org,
jbuehler AT spirentcom DOT com, cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: is there a cygwin maintainer for gnu emacs?
References: <BAY107-F8B4D21670F6A0DE5980E3F8B80 AT phx DOT gbl> <200508081031 DOT j78AVjjE008727 AT beta DOT mvs DOT co DOT il>
In-Reply-To: <200508081031.j78AVjjE008727@beta.mvs.co.il>

Ehud Karni wrote:

> AFAIK Joe Buehler is maintaining Cygwin Emacs. But may be he is not
> subscribed to emacs-devel AT gnu DOT org.
> 
> Cygwin specific Emacs problems should be discussed on cygwin AT cygwin DOT com,
> not on emacs-devel AT gnu DOT org.
> 
> What are your problems ?
> 
> May be you did rebasing (especially rebase all) - it is known to
> have a negative effect on Emacs.
> 
> I work with both Emacs 21.2 (distributed with Cygwin, prepared by
> Joe Buehler) and Emacs 22.0.50 (updated from CVS and compiled on
> 2005-08-01), both in terminal mode and on X, and they work fine.

I am aware that there are some emacs problems with recent versions
of the Cygwin dll and looking at this is on my todo list.  Various
things like a newborn and major layoffs at my place of employment
have made it difficult to do anything at the moment.

GNU emacs under Cygwin has been stable for quite a while, so my initial
take is that the problem is undoubtedly due to a change in the Cygwin
dll.  Having spent lots and lots of hours tracking down various Cygwin
problems (mostly not emacs-port related) I am dreading having to look at
this particular problem.  But like I said, it is on my todo list.

If you want a stable emacs at the moment, the best advice I can give
is to stick to older versions of the Cygwin dll until such time as I
can fix this.  It's not a great situation, but normally one does not
have to debug the OS in order to maintain emacs!
-- 
Joe Buehler


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019