Message-Id:	<200507280818.j6S8I8Tr014375@delorie.com>
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Reply-To:	<fergus AT bonhard DOT uklinux DOT net>
From:	"fergus" <fergus AT bonhard DOT uklinux DOT net>
To:	<cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Cc:	<fergus AT bonhard DOT uklinux DOT net>
Subject:	RE: ps -p <pid>
Date:	Thu, 28 Jul 2005 08:38:08 +0100
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-UoD-Scan-Signature:	4b318eb5bb8baa30a440459bb4e7bb68

> That's not good enough for scripting.

An expectation of complete congruence Unix <> Cygwin seems unrealistically
high to me. I've got a few scripts incorporating a branch as follows

	#! /bin/sh
	if [ -d c:/ ]
	then
	  {Cygwin stuff}
	else
	  {Unix equivalent}
	fi

but the number of such scripts is quite tiny, relatively speaking (about 4
in 100).

Fergus






--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -