delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: cygwin/2005/07/26/10:16:22

Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 10:16:12 -0400
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-no-personal-reply-please AT cygwin DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: What's in it for Redhat?
Message-ID: <20050726141612.GB26675@trixie.casa.cgf.cx>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <9bbd279405072604461f18ac87 AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <42E63064 DOT 4080601 AT etr-usa DOT com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <42E63064.4080601@etr-usa.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i

On Tue, Jul 26, 2005 at 06:45:24AM -0600, Warren Young wrote:
>Red Hat is involved because they bought Cygnus back in the dot-com boom 
>days.

Right.  I remember sitting in a meeting where someone asked Matthew
Szulik (Red Hat CEO) what Red Hat was going to do with Cygwin.  He blinked
and said something like "I don't know.  Maybe we won't keep it."

Just prior to the buy-out, Cygnus had made an effort to sell Cygwin
commercially but it fizzled pretty quickly.  Our CEO was focused on
setting up an embedded development IDE environment and Cygwin didn't
really fit in there.

These days, Red Hat's involvement in Cygwin development is very small.
I no longer work there and most of the work that Corinna does is on her
own time.  Corinna's main responsibilities these days revolve around
doing gdb ports to various embedded processors.  When I did work there,
I stopped being paid to work on Cygwin after 1999, since I had to spend
a lot of time sharpening my hair.

Red Hat does still sell the occasional Cygwin "proprietary" license but
it certainly doesn't funnel the money that it gets from this sale back
into Cygwin development.

I did do some major work on Cygwin for Red Hat just before leaving in
2004 but it was done in my spare time as a favor to the remnants of the
old Cygnus group.  They had a (rare) fairly big ($$$) project which
required signals to work with threads and they needed cygserver to work
better.  Corinna took the cygserver stuff and I did the signals with
threads.  In that scenario, Red Hat did fund some development.  I
believe that there is also some ongoing support work that is being
funded.

Otherwise, like I said, it's all volunteer.  So, any licensing revenue
that Red Hat gets is real gravy.
--
Christopher Faylor			spammer? ->	aaaspam AT sourceware DOT org
Cygwin Co-Project Leader				aaaspam AT duffek DOT com
TimeSys, Inc.

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019