Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID:	<42E13914.10204@rclooke.com>
Date:	Fri, 22 Jul 2005 14:21:08 -0400
From:	Joe Brown <joebrown AT rclooke DOT com>
User-Agent:	Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206)
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Cannot write files if they are hidden
References:	<42E11E4C DOT 3090406 AT hones DOT org DOT uk> <SERRANOw8lOdyqWmXE7000006b3 AT SERRANO DOT CAM DOT ARTIMI DOT COM> <dbrbr9$9cd$1 AT sea DOT gmane DOT org>
In-Reply-To:	<dbrbr9$9cd$1@sea.gmane.org>
X-IsSubscribed:	yes

My opinion of this matter:

Hidden should not imply read-only...  There are read-only and system 
attributes which can perform this feat.

Why in the world Microsoft decided hidden should be read-only in some of 
the time (dos edit -- for those of us who've had to use it when 
necessary) is beyond me.

If a file is hidden, it insinuates that an average user should not need 
access to the file.  By hiding it, under normal circumstances that 
circut is complete, one cannot edit what one cannot find.

IMO the read-only flag should be the only one that implies read-only.  I 
conceed that there is logic to the system flag also impliing read-only.  
I don't see much logic in hidden implying read-only.  That implies 
confusion to a simple state of being.

WordPad hidden-file save = access denied
NotePad hidden-file save = file saved

There is no logic in that...


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -