Mail Archives: cygwin/2005/07/11/23:50:15
On Mon, Jul 11, 2005 at 08:36:55PM -0700, Brian Dessent wrote:
>Christopher Faylor wrote:
>
>> >So, anyone who installs rebase will also need to install bash. That
>> ash
>> >seems unfortunate to me. It means we can never deprecate ash.
>
>Since cygcheck already has capability for reading package file lists
>(/etc/setup/*.lst.gz) do you think it would be sensible to move the
>'rebaseall' logic into cygcheck, so that we don't need a shell? But I
>suppose that doesn't get around the issue of not being able to run it
>from a bash CMD prompt as you can currently. Though I guess it could be
>installed as a shortcut on the startup menu or something.
No, this really has nothing to do with the concept of "checking" cygwin,
so I don't think it's appropriate here.
OTOH, writing a mingw C program to do what rebaseall does wouldn't be
*that* hard.
cgf
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
- Raw text -