Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Mon, 11 Jul 2005 22:13:50 -0400
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf-no-personal-reply-please AT cygwin DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: rebaseall (temporary?) patch
Message-ID:	<20050712021350.GC17886@trixie.casa.cgf.cx>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<20050708044418 DOT GA6431 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <20050711125847 DOT GC3856 AT tishler DOT net>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<20050711125847.GC3856@tishler.net>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.5.8i

On Mon, Jul 11, 2005 at 08:58:47AM -0400, Jason Tishler wrote:
>On Fri, Jul 08, 2005 at 12:44:18AM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>The below patch to rebaseall will avoid errors when rebasing dlls used
>>by the shell which is executing it.
>>
>>It might be interesting to automatically write a .bat file which
>>performed the final step of renaming the rebased in-use dlls to their
>>correct names but it's too late to do that.
>>
>>[snip]
>
>Thanks for the patch, but I'm leaning towards a simpler solution:
>rebaseall will verify only ash is running and exit if other Cygwin
>processes are running unless an override option (e.g., "-f") is
>supplied.

So, anyone who installs rebase will also need to install bash.  That
seems unfortunate to me.  It means we can never deprecate ash.

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -