Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID:	<04f101c58598$38ad6ca0$6508a8c0@chimaera>
From:	"Max Bowsher" <maxb AT ukf DOT net>
To:	<cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
References:	<048a01c58583$120c1980$6508a8c0 AT chimaera> <42D191CD DOT 3C06F579 AT dessent DOT net>
Subject:	Re: rebaseall now not usable because bash now dynamically linked to some DLLs.
Date:	Sun, 10 Jul 2005 22:42:08 +0100
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-IsSubscribed:	yes

Brian Dessent wrote:
> Max Bowsher wrote:
>
>> rebaseall needs no processes to be using cygwin DLLs apart from 
>> cygwin1.dll
>> itself.
>
> Did you not read the lengthy thread on this?  It started roughly here
> <http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2005-07/msg00284.html> and ended here
> <http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2005-07/msg00319.html>.

I don't read everything, I just skim subject lines usually. "Perl 
Win32::Shortcut screws up fork" didn't really catch my attention.

Granted, there was the final email titled "rebaseall (temporary?) patch" - I 
guess I just missed that one.

Max.


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -