Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From:	Eric Blake <ebb9 AT byu DOT net>
Subject:	Re: Unwanted .exe appended to symlinks
Date:	Sat, 9 Jul 2005 16:50:07 +0000 (UTC)
Lines:	21
Message-ID:	<loom.20050709T184622-34@post.gmane.org>
References:	<1120880636 DOT 6400 DOT 7 DOT camel AT localhost DOT localdomain> <42CFD190 DOT 2060109 AT byu DOT net> <20050709153641 DOT GR7507 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>
Mime-Version:	1.0
User-Agent:	Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/)
X-IsSubscribed:	yes

Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin <at> cygwin.com> writes:

> 
> On Jul  9 07:30, Eric Blake wrote:
> > Hmm, while I'm at it, "dirname //" should return //, not /.
> 
> No.  // is a perfectly valid root dir in a system which differs between
> / and //.  Let dirname(1) just use what it gets from dirname(3).
> 
> Corinna
> 

Actually, dirname(1) doesn't call dirname(3) - there are enough quirks in
various platforms' dirname(3), plus POSIX requires the algorithm of dirname(1)
to work even on invalid pathnames.  But yes, we are in violent agreement, and I
have posted an upstream bug-fix request to get the output of dirname(1) fixed in
coreutils.

--
Eric Blake



--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -