Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Sat, 9 Jul 2005 18:10:13 +0200
From:	Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Unwanted .exe appended to symlinks
Message-ID:	<20050709161013.GT7507@calimero.vinschen.de>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<1120880636 DOT 6400 DOT 7 DOT camel AT localhost DOT localdomain> <42CFD190 DOT 2060109 AT byu DOT net> <20050709153641 DOT GR7507 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<20050709153641.GR7507@calimero.vinschen.de>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.4.2i

On Jul  9 17:36, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Jul  9 07:30, Eric Blake wrote:
> > Hmm, while I'm at it, "dirname //" should return //, not /.
> 
> No.  // is a perfectly valid root dir in a system which differs between
> / and //.  Let dirname(1) just use what it gets from dirname(3).

As Igor stated on cygwin-talk, we're in violent agreement.  I simply
misread your statement.  Sorry about that.


Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Project Co-Leader          mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat, Inc.

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -