Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Thu, 7 Jul 2005 23:00:35 -0700
From:	Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes <sthoenna AT efn DOT org>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Running Windows apps (newbie again)
Message-ID:	<20050708060035.GA3200@efn.org>
References:	<81cec738050707162564c2d361 AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <Pine DOT GSO DOT 4 DOT 61 DOT 0507072013130 DOT 29317 AT slinky DOT cs DOT nyu DOT edu>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<Pine.GSO.4.61.0507072013130.29317@slinky.cs.nyu.edu>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.4.2.1i
X-IsSubscribed:	yes

On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 08:15:42PM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Jul 2005, Rex Eastbourne wrote:
> 
> > Hi all,
> > If I already have a program, such as Emacs, that comes with Cygwin,
> > should I keep my own version, or get the Cygwin version? (The shell
> > doesn't recognize the 'emacs' command, but I presume I can fix that by
> > changing my $PATH). Are there any other advantages to the Cygwin
> > versions?
> 
> The Cygwin versions of programs would understand Cygwin mounts and POSIX
> paths, as well as signals.  Other than that, the differences are likely to
> be superficial (depending on the program).

You left off the "and likely be slower" part.

Also on the advantage side is having a cygwin package maintainer out there
ready to address bugs and upgrade to newer versions for you.

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -