Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID:	<42CDD770.DC75AD8B@dessent.net>
Date:	Thu, 07 Jul 2005 18:31:28 -0700
From:	Brian Dessent <brian AT dessent DOT net>
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: rsync package version in Cygwin
References:	<web-97892887 AT cgpsrv2 DOT cis DOT mcmaster DOT ca>
X-Spam-Report:	-5.9/5.0 ---- Start SpamAssassin results * -3.3 ALL_TRUSTED Did not pass through any untrusted hosts * -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * 0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list ---- End SpamAssassin results
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Herman Poon wrote:

> I'm wondering why the release of rsync that is in the current Cygwin
> setup is only 2.6.3, when 2.6.4 was released on March 30, 2005 and
> 2.6.5 was released on June 1, 2005. Rsync is even at 2.6.6pre1 now (I
> got the announcement today via rsync-announce).
> 
> I'm not "complaining" per se since I realize that Cygwin is
> community-driven by (mostly? all?) unpaid contributors, but rather
> curious as to why there continues to be a lag in the release. In fact,
> unless I'm going crazy (which could very well be the case) I thought
> that Cygwin included rsync 2.6.4 at some point but has since gone back
> to 2.6.3.
> 
> Can anyone please shed some light on this issue? Who is the rsync
> package maintainer (if there is one, even unofficially) for the Cygwin
> project? Thanks very much.

The maintainer is Lapo Luchini.  This can be seen from the
announcements:
<http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=cygwin-announce&w=4&r=1&s=rsync&q=b>.

You would have to ask him why the Cygwin package is a little behind, but
I would imagine it's just because of lack of free time.  That said,
being 3 months behind an upstream release is not really that long of a
time period, especially if people's lives get busy.

Brian

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -