delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: cygwin/2005/07/07/17:49:36

Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2005 17:49:13 -0400
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-no-personal-reply-please AT cygwin DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: question for perl maintainer
Message-ID: <20050707214913.GA22301@trixie.casa.cgf.cx>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <7231C15EAC2F164CA6DC326D97493C8BA1C3F1 AT exchange35 DOT fed DOT cclrc DOT ac DOT uk> <6 DOT 2 DOT 1 DOT 2 DOT 0 DOT 20050707140715 DOT 03ce4ac0 AT pop DOT prospeed DOT net> <20050707182759 DOT GA15923 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <42CD945A DOT 4070607 AT familiehaase DOT de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <42CD945A.4070607@familiehaase.de>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i

On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 10:45:14PM +0200, Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
>Christopher Faylor wrote:
>
>>On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 02:08:40PM -0400, Larry Hall wrote:
>>
>>>At 01:10 PM 7/7/2005, you wrote:
>>>
>>>>In an attempt to work round the problem with readshortcut I reported
>>>>earlier, I thought I'd use a Perl script. Unfortunately the
>>>>Win32::Shortcut package seems to cause problems with process forking
>>>>(unlike the readshortcut error, this one isn't specific to the latest
>>>>cygwin DLL). I get an error
>>>>
>>>>C:\cygwin\bin\perl.exe (3088): *** unable to remap
>>>>C:\cygwin\lib\perl5\vendor_perl\5.8\cygwin\auto\Win32\Shortcut\Shortcut.
>>>>dll to same address as parent(0xBF0000) != 0x1110000
>>>>   13 [main] perl 3716 fork_parent: child 3088 died waiting for dll
>>>>loading 
>>>
>>>Sounds like a classic rebasing issue to me.  Have you tried running
>>>'rebaseall'?
>>
>>Wouldn't this problem be ameliorated slightly if the perl DLLs all
>>loaded in unique addresses to begin with?  Isn't the problem that all
>>perl DLLs (and probably others) are loading in address 0x10000000?
>>
>>Gerrit, would you be willing to change this so that the DLLs load in
>>non-default locations?  This would probably help everyone right out
>>of the box?
>
>Sounds good.  WHat is the magic flag I need to add to the link commands?

Something like -Wl,--image-base=0xsomething .

Or, you could just rebase the dlls prior to releasing perl, I guess.

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019