Mail Archives: cygwin/2005/06/30/11:32:23
On Thu, Jun 30, 2005 at 03:37:25PM +0100, Dave Korn wrote:
> I think I remember noticing that backtracing across sigfe doesn't always
>work too well. Then again, there could be a problem with the debug info:
"doesn't always" == "never".
>>#3 0x00435d27 in fhandler_pipe::get_guard ()
>
>makes no sense. But I would imagine the peculiarity is down to sigfe;
>it does something unexpected to the stack frame, that the debug info
>doesn't reflect.
No, it's due to the fact that 0x00435d27 is an address in the
application and the application has no debugging symbols.
>>In case you haven't noticed, I'm running a snapshot, which, IIUC, *is*
>>a debug build. And that doesn't help much, as you can see.
>
>Debug yes; unoptimised, I think not, although we'd need cgf or cv to
>confirm how the snapshot process works.
The snapshots are unstripped. Otherwise, it is a normal build.
cgf
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
- Raw text -