Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From:	"Dave Korn" <dave DOT korn AT artimi DOT com>
To:	<cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject:	RE: Byte-order in od -x (Win2K)
Date:	Tue, 28 Jun 2005 16:16:10 +0100
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<830404B1D376BA46BC25BE71A3E12873B9B734@corvus.tcgp.dundee.ac.uk>
Message-ID:	<SERRANO18zxGdJcEoBj00000259@SERRANO.CAM.ARTIMI.COM>

----Original Message----
>From: Fergus Daly
>Sent: 28 June 2005 15:45

> 
> ("od -x .." outputs the strange transposition of bytes that you have
> referred to.)

  It's not a 'transposition of bytes'.  It's not bytes at all; "od -x"
defaults to reading 16-bit short integers, and outputs them in host-endian
order.  It's completely correct.  "od -x" is the same as "od -x2" which is
different from "od -x1" which is what the OP really wanted in the first
place.

  Now, I'd certainly agree that short int is a strange default for od (as
indeed is octal, which it defaults to if you don't specify a base
explicitly); but it's not 'strange' and nothing is 'transposed', it's simply
correct-albeit-unexpected behaviour.


    cheers,
      DaveK
-- 
Can't think of a witty .sigline today....


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -