Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Thu, 16 Jun 2005 20:31:59 -0400
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf-no-personal-reply-please AT cygwin DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Any chance to get Apache 2.0.xx working on cygwin?
Message-ID:	<20050617003159.GB12614@trixie.casa.cgf.cx>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<508734440 AT web DOT de> <20050616212135 DOT GB11157 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <6 DOT 2 DOT 1 DOT 2 DOT 0 DOT 20050616201649 DOT 03b4a988 AT pop DOT prospeed DOT net>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<6.2.1.2.0.20050616201649.03b4a988@pop.prospeed.net>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.5.8i

On Thu, Jun 16, 2005 at 08:21:11PM -0400, Larry Hall wrote:
>At 05:21 PM 6/16/2005, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>On Thu, Jun 16, 2005 at 10:39:08PM +0200, Andreas Eibach wrote:
>
><snip>
>
>>>>I'm glad that someone finally suggested this.  I think a few more
>>>>messages along these lines would have surely kick started a mean
>>>>response from me.
>>>
>>>Pity it didn't come.  I would have been able to answer accordingly,
>>>mind you.  I cannot understand why you are always so short-tempered if
>>>someone reports a problem.  But if you want war, you get war if need
>>>be.
>>
>>Can't talk now.  I'm digging trenches.
>
>I hope you're using ht://Dig!

Ooooooohhhh...   Ouuuuccchhhhh...

I think Larry needs a gold star for most on-topic and painful pun.

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -