Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Thu, 16 Jun 2005 17:21:35 -0400
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf-no-personal-reply-please AT cygwin DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Any chance to get Apache 2.0.xx working on cygwin?
Message-ID:	<20050616212135.GB11157@trixie.casa.cgf.cx>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<508734440 AT web DOT de>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<508734440@web.de>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.5.8i

On Thu, Jun 16, 2005 at 10:39:08PM +0200, Andreas Eibach wrote:
>cygwin AT cygwin DOT com schrieb am 16.06.05 17:03:10:

Actually, that was cgf-no-personal-reply-please AT cygwin DOT com who schrieb:

>>>site:cygwin.com inurl:cygwin inurl:ml <query words here>
>>>
>>>You can even use more "inurl:"s to restrict by year/month since those
>>>are part of the URL.  In addition, the list is archived at many other
>>>places, all of which have searches.  Three that come to mind are
>>>gmane.org, marc.theaimsgroup.com, and mail-archive.com.
>>
>>I'm glad that someone finally suggested this.  I think a few more
>>messages along these lines would have surely kick started a mean
>>response from me.
>
>Pity it didn't come.  I would have been able to answer accordingly,
>mind you.  I cannot understand why you are always so short-tempered if
>someone reports a problem.  But if you want war, you get war if need
>be.

Can't talk now.  I'm digging trenches.

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -