Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID:	<42ACF4A2.41F414E6@dessent.net>
Date:	Sun, 12 Jun 2005 19:51:14 -0700
From:	Brian Dessent <brian AT dessent DOT net>
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Making /bin/sh == bash. Has the time come?
References:	<20050613021516 DOT 7B9E913C237 AT cgf DOT cx> <20050613024108 DOT GA3739 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx>
X-Spam-Report:	-5.6/5.0 ---- Start SpamAssassin results * -3.3 ALL_TRUSTED Did not pass through any untrusted hosts * -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * 0.3 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list ---- End SpamAssassin results
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Christopher Faylor wrote:

> Now I'm confused, too.  I thought the complaints were coming from people
> who used configure.  Maybe they were coming from old configure scripts
> or possibly from makefiles.

I always got the impression that most of those type of complaints were
people that had written a (non-configure) script themselves, under
linux, with /bin/sh as the shebang, and then tried to run it under
Cygwin.

Brian

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -