Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From:	"Krzysztof Duleba" <krzysan AT skrzynka DOT pl>
Subject:	Re: Making /bin/sh == bash. Has the time come?
Date:	Sun, 12 Jun 2005 21:15:39 +0200
Lines:	16
Message-ID:	<d8i115$60l$1@sea.gmane.org>
References:	<20050610150729 DOT GA13181 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <20050610231343 DOT 6A12713C0A7 AT cgf DOT cx> <20050611003817 DOT GB1106 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <d8egni$vd3$1 AT sea DOT gmane DOT org> <004701c56f79$1eb791c0$d119fea9 AT pcdahl4201>
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-IsSubscribed:	yes

Thorsten Dahlheimer wrote:

> Are you sure you didn't actually measure bash's performance twice?

Yes, you're right. I didn't set CONFIG_SHELL. I feel really stupid about
it :-( I only copied bash to /bin/sh.

At the moment my CPU load is high, so it's not the best time to run
benchmarks, but MC configure results are similar. I'll rerun the full
tests later.

Thanks for pointing that out.

Regards
Krzysztof Duleba



--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -