delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Message-ID: | <429F885F.1010801@etr-usa.com> |
Date: | Thu, 02 Jun 2005 16:29:51 -0600 |
From: | Warren Young <warren AT etr-usa DOT com> |
User-Agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.7) Gecko/20050414 |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
To: | Cygwin-L <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
Subject: | Re: Drop Win9x support? (was: Serious performance problems) |
References: | <14CEE0B69DBDFC41A192613D8B4098CA016595AB AT XCH-CORP DOT staktek DOT com> |
In-Reply-To: | <14CEE0B69DBDFC41A192613D8B4098CA016595AB@XCH-CORP.staktek.com> |
X-IsSubscribed: | yes |
Terry Dabbs wrote: > > I am supporting applications requiring cygwin on '95 and '98 that are > not going away anytime soon. That's fine, but do you really need new functionality? Again, I'm not saying "delete all Cygwin binaries that support Win9x". I'm saying "stop requiring Win9x compatibility in new binaries". -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |