Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID:	<429F7678.1050302@familiehaase.de>
Date:	Thu, 02 Jun 2005 23:13:28 +0200
From:	"Gerrit P. Haase" <gerrit AT familiehaase DOT de>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.7.8) Gecko/20050511
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Serious performance problems (malloc related?)
References:	<3D848382FB72E249812901444C6BDB1D03E04FD3 AT exchange DOT timesys DOT com> <Pine DOT GSO DOT 4 DOT 61 DOT 0506021453200 DOT 23568 AT slinky DOT cs DOT nyu DOT edu>
In-Reply-To:	<Pine.GSO.4.61.0506021453200.23568@slinky.cs.nyu.edu>
X-IsSubscribed:	yes

Igor Pechtchanski wrote:

> On Thu, 2 Jun 2005, Robb, Sam wrote:
>>Is there any reason why the cygwin DLL couldn't be built
>>twice: once for Win9x, and once for WinNT-based systems?
>>
>>Aside from potential installation issues ("install this
>>version of the DLL under 9x, that version under NT), it
>>seems like this would be a reasonable optimization.

> As long as we're mulling over ideas...

Alternatively, we could drop Win98 support.


Gerrit
-- 
=^..^=

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -