delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Message-ID: | <20050602154308.93531.qmail@web31706.mail.mud.yahoo.com> |
Date: | Thu, 2 Jun 2005 08:43:08 -0700 (PDT) |
From: | Sunil <funtoos AT yahoo DOT com> |
Subject: | Re: Serious performance problems (malloc related?) |
To: | Linda W <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
In-Reply-To: | <429ED094.9080001@tlinx.org> |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
X-IsSubscribed: | yes |
> amusingling enough -- their > execution times are *slower* than cygwin's... Of this is a joke right? I found SFU to be at least 2-3 times faster in loading and executing programs in general. Its too bad their POSIX imple. is less than half baked and unuseable for building any package OOTB. > course MS might have > deliberately used non-optimized methods for their > services to convince > people to recode for the Win32 interface (and thus > benefit by increased > Win32 lockin). this might be famously true. -Sunil __________________________________ Discover Yahoo! Find restaurants, movies, travel and more fun for the weekend. Check it out! http://discover.yahoo.com/weekend.html -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |