Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Thu, 26 May 2005 10:58:43 -0400
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf-no-personal-reply-please AT cygwin DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Questions on patching dcrt0.cc
Message-ID:	<20050526145843.GB5619@trixie.casa.cgf.cx>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<1117064831 DOT 5390 DOT 174 DOT camel AT fulgurite> <Pine DOT GSO DOT 4 DOT 61 DOT 0505252005040 DOT 8541 AT slinky DOT cs DOT nyu DOT edu>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<Pine.GSO.4.61.0505252005040.8541@slinky.cs.nyu.edu>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.5.8i

On Thu, May 26, 2005 at 12:38:56AM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
>> 3.  I want to spare anyone making use of the test program any
>>     worries over legalities.  Should I submit it under the cygwin
>>     license or put it in the public domain?
>
>Either would be fine, AFAIU, but wait for CGF or Corinna to confirm it.

I don't know what "submit it" means here.  If the submission is for inclusion
somewhere in the cygwin-specific part of winsup then the code needs to be
assigned to Red Hat.  Otherwise, why not just make it GPL?

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -