Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From:	ericblake AT comcast DOT net (Eric Blake)
To:	Cygwin List <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject:	Re: Sort - locale: cygwin_nt-5.0
Date:	Tue, 17 May 2005 23:02:09 +0000
Message-Id:	<051720052302.23679.428A77F10009C4D100005C7F22069997350A050E040D0C079D0A@comcast.net>
X-Authenticated-Sender:	ZXJpY2JsYWtlQGNvbWNhc3QubmV0

> >In other words, unless someone submits a patch to cygwin with a compliant 
> strcoll, you are stuck with non-locale sorts on cygwin. 
> 
> 
> Don't you mean that newlib is the one that requires the patch?

Either place would work, but the philosophy of newlib is that it is for
embedded systems, and my understanding is that Jeff does not want
to add locale support to newlib any time soon.  A cygwin-local replacement
for strcoll would not affect any other newlib targets.  But regardless of
whether it is newlib or cygwin that is patched, <http://cygwin.com/acronyms/#SHTDI>!

--
Eric Blake



--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -