Mail Archives: cygwin/2005/05/10/20:19:04
On 5/10/05, Christopher Faylor <cgf-no-personal-reply-please AT cygwin DOT com> wrote:
> On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 03:27:02PM -0400, William M. (Mike) Miller wrote:
> >On 5/10/05, Christopher Faylor <cgf-no-personal-reply-please AT cygwin DOT com> wrote:
> >> Previous to 1.5.16, static destructors were always called via a
> >> gcc "atexit" mechanism. This meant that there were scenarios where
> >> destructors would not be called at all so I made cygwin's exit call
> >> the destructors explicitly. I just forgot to make cygwin do the right
> >> thing when returning from main rather than exiting. This will be
> >> fixed in the next snapshot.
> >
> >Sorry, one more question. I thought from the above that
> >reinstalling 1.5.15 would restore the previous behavior for static
> >destructors. According to cygcheck, I now have cygwin 1.5.15-1
> >installed, but I still don't see the static destructor output. Is there
> >something else I need to revert while waiting for the fix?
>
> Install the snapshot: http://cygwin.com/snapshots/
Yep, fixed. Thanks again.
--
William M. (Mike) Miller | Edison Design Group
william DOT m DOT miller AT gmail DOT com
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
- Raw text -