Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Thu, 5 May 2005 20:59:59 -0400
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf-no-personal-reply-please AT cygwin DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: cygwin version 1.5.16-1 (exim 4.50-1, minires 1.00-1, perl 5.8.6-4) attempting to run spamassassin (spamc and spamd)
Message-ID:	<20050506005959.GB24007@trixie.casa.cgf.cx>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<427A9D72 DOT 2070302 AT infobro DOT com> <20050505232423 DOT GG15066 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <427ABD77 DOT A45440E9 AT dessent DOT net>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<427ABD77.A45440E9@dessent.net>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.5.8i

On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 05:42:31PM -0700, Brian Dessent wrote:
>Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>reported that it was still broken in the cygwin-developers mailing
>>list.  That's why it is only fixed in the snapshot.  I'm glad to see
>>that it is now ok but it makes me wonder what else I now broke.  :-)
>
>I still have not given up on trying to come up with a decent testcase
>for that, btw.

Thanks.  This is something that I suspect is apt to break again.  It
would be nice to have a way to detect that.

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -