Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Wed, 4 May 2005 13:13:10 -0400
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf-no-personal-reply-please AT cygwin DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: pwd vs $PWD, bash, cygwin vs Linux
Message-ID:	<20050504171309.GT24661@trixie.casa.cgf.cx>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<20050504162931 DOT 2282 DOT qmail AT web30206 DOT mail DOT mud DOT yahoo DOT com> <SERRANOSvux4Jf7zynr000001ff AT SERRANO DOT CAM DOT ARTIMI DOT COM>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<SERRANOSvux4Jf7zynr000001ff@SERRANO.CAM.ARTIMI.COM>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.5.8i

On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 05:50:14PM +0100, Dave Korn wrote:
>----Original Message----
>>From: Peter Farley
>>Sent: 04 May 2005 17:30
>
>> WHOA there.  I think we have a slight failure to
>> communicate.  I am NOT the OP, I was just chiming in
>> on the conversation 
>
>  Oops, so you are!  Umm, I mean, "So you aren't!"  Ermmm.. guess I mean
>"Pardon me for not checking!"

Ditto.  I even went back to check the original posting and didn't notice
the different From:.  That's embarrassing.  Sorry.

The points are still valid, ", however.  I don't see any reason to raise
global concerns about makefile interoperability with linux just because
one person has a trivially-solveable problem with a couple of makefiles.

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -