Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Cam-SpamDetails:	Not scanned
X-Cam-AntiVirus:	No virus found
X-Cam-ScannerInfo:	http://www.cam.ac.uk/cs/email/scanner/
Message-ID:	<00da01c54fd4$e1dbd9f0$e6ec6f83@chimaera>
From:	"Max Bowsher" <maxb AT ukf DOT net>
To:	"James Renton" <jrenton AT castel DOT com>, <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
References:	<53BD2E0187CCDE4C81FA4B7DCFB0513905B7D1 AT CASCITRIX01 DOT hq DOT castel DOT com>
Subject:	Re: setup alternatives (was Re: Bespoke installations: simple elegance of setup.exe when setup.ini is absent)
Date:	Tue, 3 May 2005 12:40:18 +0100
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Note-from-DJ:	This may be spam

James Renton wrote:
> What about http://sourceforge.net/projects/wix/?

There are very many installer builders for windows, but none that I have 
seen manage many independently updated packages with interdependencies, in 
the way that our current setup does.


Max.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com [mailto:cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com] On Behalf
> Of Christopher Faylor
> Sent: Monday, May 02, 2005 4:39 PM
> To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
> Subject: setup alternatives (was Re: Bespoke installations: simple
> elegance of setup.exe when setup.ini is absent)
>
> On Mon, May 02, 2005 at 12:57:18PM -0700, Sean McMahon wrote:
>> I for one appreciate the clarification as I sent a detailed bug-report
>> to this person assuming they were the maintainer.  My question as I've
>> asked before is, can or is someone working on improving accessibility
>> of setup.exe for those of us who have to use windows via a screenreader
>
>> and keyboard.  Many of the buttons and controlls do not get focus and
>> can't be opperated in the normal manner.
>
> Did you happen to follow the "setup.exe sucks" thread over in
> cygwin-apps?  Basically, it boils down to the fact that I and others are
> not really thrilled with setup.exe in its current form.  While it is an
> impressive program in some ways, the UI is (apparently) too
> non-intuitive and the mean-time between bug fixes is too long.
>
> Are you aware of a setup-like program out there which "gets it right" as
> far as UI is concerned?  It would be nice to transition to an
> open-sources alternative which was actively supported.
>
> cgf
>
> --
> Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
> Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
> Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
> FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/ 


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -