Message-Id:	<200504290136.j3T1aaFo023886@delorie.com>
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From:	"Gary R. Van Sickle" <g DOT r DOT vansickle AT worldnet DOT att DOT net>
To:	<cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>, <newlib AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
Subject:	RE: [PATCH] Fix newly exposed bug [was RE: RFC: Fix partial NaN-parsing problem [was RE: sscanf problem]]
Date:	Thu, 28 Apr 2005 20:38:02 -0500
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<SERRANOwr2UAaTzvb5Y0000017b@SERRANO.CAM.ARTIMI.COM>
X-IsSubscribed:	yes

>   Heh, actually we probably have to talk about that.  The k 
> should IIUIC be swallowed by the %lf and the %c should fail; 
> this is the production described as NAN(n-char-sequence opt) 
> in the C language spec, strtod documentation (that's 
> 7.20.1.3.3 in WG14/N843 draft, I don't have the final 
> version).  And we haven't even mentioned the lack of INF 
> support yet :)
> 
>   However I'm on UK time, so it won't be happening today!
> 
> 
>     cheers,
>       DaveK

You should switch to UTC.

;-)

-- 
Gary R. Van Sickle


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -