delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Subject: | Re: mkstemp bug |
Mail-Copies-To: | never |
Reply-To: | sds AT gnu DOT org |
X-Attribution: | Sam |
X-Disclaimer: | You should not expect anyone to agree with me. |
From: | Sam Steingold <sds AT gnu DOT org> |
In-Reply-To: | <20050428022934.GC31448@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> (Christopher Faylor's message of "Wed, 27 Apr 2005 22:29:34 -0400") |
References: | <usm1cb0aa DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org> <u8y33c1ta DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org> <20050427222031 DOT GB24021 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <u4qdrbxhi DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org> <20050428022934 DOT GC31448 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Date: | Thu, 28 Apr 2005 09:42:16 -0400 |
Message-ID: | <usm1b9fwn.fsf@gnu.org> |
User-Agent: | Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (windows-nt) |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
> * Christopher Faylor <pts-ab-crefbany-ercyl-cyrnfr AT pltjva DOT pbz> [2005-04-27 22:29:34 -0400]: > > On Wed, Apr 27, 2005 at 07:39:37PM -0400, Sam Steingold wrote: >>> * Christopher Faylor <pts-ab-crefbany-ercyl-cyrnfr AT pltjva DOT pbz> [2005-04-27 18:20:31 -0400]: >>> >>>>the problem is that mkstemp() does not regard FIFOs (as created by >>>>mkfifo() or mknod()) as existing files. >>>> >>>>e.g. >>>> >>>> char s1[] = "/tmp/foo-XXXXXX"; >>>> char s2[] = "/tmp/foo-XXXXXX"; >>>> int fd = mkstemp(s1); >>>> close(fd); remove(s1); >>>> mkfifo(s1,0644); >>>> mkstemp(s2); >>>> strcmp(s1,s2) ===> 0 >>> >>> fifos just barely work under cygwin. I wouldn't recommend using them. >> >>Yes, it appears that they are heavily broken. > > So when I say "fifos just barely work" you felt the need to inform me > that they don't work? And that advances the discussion how, exactly? I did not just tell you that they are broken. I also gave you a test case for FIFOs. I think such a test case is useful for development and debugging. -- Sam Steingold (http://www.podval.org/~sds) running w2k <http://www.openvotingconsortium.org/> <http://www.camera.org> <http://www.honestreporting.com> <http://www.dhimmi.com/> <http://ffii.org/> Isn't "Microsoft Works" an advertisement lie? -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |