Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Thu, 28 Apr 2005 01:34:50 -0400
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf-no-personal-reply-please AT cygwin DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: mkstemp bug
Message-ID:	<20050428053450.GA23599@trixie.casa.cgf.cx>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<20050428022934 DOT GC31448 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <20050428042527 DOT 6DF0113C1C8 AT cgf DOT cx>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<20050428042527.6DF0113C1C8@cgf.cx>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.5.8i

On Wed, Apr 27, 2005 at 11:26:32PM -0500, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote:
>>>>fifos just barely work under cygwin.  I wouldn't recommend using them.
>>>
>>>Yes, it appears that they are heavily broken.
>>
>>So when I say "fifos just barely work" you felt the need to inform me
>>that they don't work?  And that advances the discussion how, exactly?
>>
>
>And your pathological touchiness serves what purpose exactly?  Take
>your meds already.  Christ.

By the way, I think I've previously implied that I don't appreciate the
use of this kind of profanity here.

I would appreciate it if you would refrain from using this type of
language in the cygwin mailing lists.

Re: http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2003-03/msg00299.html

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -