Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Authentication-Warning:	ares.its.yale.edu: lsb32 owned process doing -bs
Date:	Thu, 14 Apr 2005 08:04:59 -0400 (EDT)
From:	Lev S Bishop <lev DOT bishop AT yale DOT edu>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	RE: Bash Process Substitution
Message-ID:	<Pine.LNX.4.44.0504140718170.12305-100000@ares.its.yale.edu>
MIME-Version:	1.0

I tried building bash from the source package, and then it uses either
/dev/fd (if I have that as a symlink) or /proc/self/fd (if I don't),
rather than the fifo that the binary package uses. So perhaps whoever
built the binary package didn't have /proc/self/fd for whatever reason?

With my built bash.exe, process substitution seems to work for input:
$ echo <(ls)
/proc/self/fd/63
$ cat <(echo hi)
hi

But not for output:
$ tar -cf >(cat) syntax.c
tar: /proc/self/fd/63: Cannot open: Permission denied
tar: Error is not recoverable: exiting now

I'm not sure how there can be a permissions problem or what to do about 
it if there really is one, given that as I understand it 
the /proc/self/fd/63 is effectively a symlink to one end of something 
returned from pipe(2).

Lev



--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -