Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Wed, 13 Apr 2005 13:34:29 -0400
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf-no-personal-reply-please AT cygwin DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: regression in utime
Message-ID:	<20050413173429.GA5792@trixie.casa.cgf.cx>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<041320051446 DOT 13106 DOT 425D30B900003E300000333222069984990A050E040D0C079D0A AT comcast DOT net>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<041320051446.13106.425D30B900003E300000333222069984990A050E040D0C079D0A@comcast.net>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.5.8i

On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 02:46:17PM +0000, Eric Blake wrote:
>I'm not sure when this regressed, but in comparing logs of coreutils
>testsuite runs, sometime between 1.5.12 and 1.5.14 utime() was broken
>with regards to fifos.  It is still broken in the 20050412 snapshot:
>
>$ mkfifo foo
>$ touch foo
>touch: setting times of `foo': Invalid argument
>
>It used to return successfully (I'm not sure whether it actually
>touched times in 1.5.12, only that it didn't die with EINVAL).

This should successfully touch foo in the latest snapshot.

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -