Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Tue, 5 Apr 2005 11:27:55 -0400
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf-no-personal-reply-please AT cygwin DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: XEmacs+aspell failed on cygwin 1.5.14-1
Message-ID:	<20050405152755.GE19678@trixie.casa.cgf.cx>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<20050405150621 DOT GD19678 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <SERRANOGp8IJfq2BkWG0000005b AT SERRANO DOT CAM DOT ARTIMI DOT COM>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<SERRANOGp8IJfq2BkWG0000005b@SERRANO.CAM.ARTIMI.COM>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.5.8i

On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 04:10:52PM +0100, Dave Korn wrote:
>>On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 10:52:45AM -0400, xiet wrote:
>>>>The 2005-04-05 snapshot may fix this problem.  It is being generated
>>>>now.
>>>
>>>I just replaced /bin/cygwin1.dll (~1.2M) with the snapshot (more than
>>>8M?).
>>
>>The DLL is reported as 1,944 Kb on the web page.
>>
>>>cygcheck says the snapshot is 1.5.13-1.
>>
>>Um, no.  cygcheck should say 1.5.15-1 if you are using the snapshot.
>
>You know, I suspect that the second oddity explains the first....
>wasn't 1.5.13-1 one of the ones you generated with full debug info in?

I haven't been stripping binaries for a while but the size on the web
page is accurate.  The snapshot also does report 1.5.15.  I checked both
things before responding.

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -