Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From:	"Dave Korn" <dave DOT korn AT artimi DOT com>
To:	<cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject:	RE: ipc, sockets and windows sp2
Date:	Mon, 4 Apr 2005 15:30:17 +0100
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<20050404142543.GU1471@cygbert.vinschen.de>
Message-ID:	<SERRANO4jCEq6u6yX490000002f@SERRANO.CAM.ARTIMI.COM>
X-OriginalArrivalTime:	04 Apr 2005 14:30:40.0573 (UTC) FILETIME=[E05C16D0:01C53922]

----Original Message----
>From: Corinna Vinschen
>Sent: 04 April 2005 15:26

> On Apr  4 14:45, Dave Korn wrote:
>>   Incidentally, what's the difference between the cygwin0.dll and the
>> new-cygwin1.dll, anyone?  Is the -0.dll the
> 
> The cygwin0.dll is tweaked to run in the testsuite, while another version
> of Cygwin is still running.
 

  :)  OK, I'll leave you and Brian to fight this one out.  Even though you
say I guessed right, I notice that "ls -lai *.dll" in my build dir shows
both .dlls having the same inode, and "diff --binary cygwin0.dll
new-cygwin1.dll" shows no differences.

  Actually I suppose there need not be a conflict between your statements
and his if the new-cygwin1.dll is _also_ tweaked..... <g>


    cheers,
      DaveK
-- 
Can't think of a witty .sigline today....


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -