Mail Archives: cygwin/2005/04/04/06:38:45
On Apr 4 08:52, Vincent Dedun wrote:
> However, semaphores still doesn't work properly.
> There is no more problem with semop not waiting, but with quick
> semaphores locking unlocking.
>
> I attach a new testcase, which is the same as previous one, except each
> child task will lock the semaphore, wait 100ms, then release the
> semaphore and die. Each time a child dies, a new one is created to keep
> 10 running childs.
I'm wondering, since you're building Cygwin from source anyway, if you're
not interested to debug this further or even track it down to its source?
Corinna
--
Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Project Co-Leader mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat, Inc.
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
- Raw text -