Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID:	<424AE898.5080207@kleckner.net>
Date:	Wed, 30 Mar 2005 09:57:44 -0800
From:	Jim Kleckner <jek-cygwin1 AT kleckner DOT net>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20041217
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: clamwin installs incompatible copy of cygwin1.dll
References:	<424373E3 DOT 8060901 AT kleckner DOT net> <4243839B DOT 719CB945 AT dessent DOT net> <6 DOT 2 DOT 0 DOT 14 DOT 0 DOT 20050324221252 DOT 03c0d8a0 AT pop DOT prospeed DOT net> <4249DB69 DOT 8090903 AT kleckner DOT net> <6 DOT 2 DOT 1 DOT 2 DOT 0 DOT 20050329223500 DOT 03927d88 AT pop DOT prospeed DOT net> <20050330073150 DOT GA9260 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de> <20050330143018 DOT GF2969 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <424ACEF0 DOT 1070503 AT kleckner DOT net> <20050330162133 DOT GC4621 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <424AD796 DOT 9030708 AT kleckner DOT net> <20050330165754 DOT GD4621 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx>
In-Reply-To:	<20050330165754.GD4621@trixie.casa.cgf.cx>
X-IsSubscribed:	yes

Christopher Faylor wrote:

> On Wed, Mar 30, 2005 at 08:45:10AM -0800, Jim Kleckner wrote:

> So, if you're a Unix guy since 1978, that puts you in a unique category.
> You don't qualify as a FAQ.

I don't quite understand this.  I don't qualify to write FAQ entries
or shouldn't be allowed to use them?

> I have very strong reservations about filling up documentation with
> every conceivable combination of advice that we could possibly think of.
> Adding rationales to stop Unix guys from shooting themselves in the foot
> should not be a focus of the FAQ.  The FAQ is there to give advice to
> people on what to do, not to provide rationales for why they shouldn't
> do other things that pop into their heads.

Then strike the link text and limit it to the workaround of adding
the bin to the system path.   My text was a suggested starting point.

>>Look, all I'm trying to do here is save time for other people, not
>>waste all of our time.  The notion that the email list should be
>>the primary reference for this kind of issue is wrong.  And it shouldn't
>>be this hard to try to help out either.
> 
> 
> The solution that the DLL has to be in the system path is not required
> for a sanctioned Cygwin release.  But, then, we've seen before that
> clamwin insists on running in a non-cygwin environment.  I don't want to
> be in the business of adding advice to the FAQ for fixing up other
> people's problems.

Nobody said the workaround was required.

I am very grateful for the great lengths you go to to fix other people's
problems who use cygwin.

> If this is a problem with clamwin then people should be lobbying them
> for a fix, not suggesting that the Cygwin FAQ has to be modified as
> a workaround.

Agree that clamwin should be fixed.  I don't use it and don't care to
use it.  But then I share the compute resources.

Jim

- "It is better to light a candle than curse the darkness"

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -