delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Message-ID: | <4238C25B.505E9141@dessent.net> |
Date: | Wed, 16 Mar 2005 15:33:47 -0800 |
From: | Brian Dessent <brian AT dessent DOT net> |
Organization: | My own little world... |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Subject: | Re: Single Packaged Shell? |
References: | <7dd7b97a05031512037bc6fb10 AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> |
X-IsSubscribed: | yes |
Reply-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
John Westbrook wrote: > I have heard that you can compile perl code into c code, so I was > wondering if anything similar exists for shell scripts or even cygwin > itself. Ideally I would like to distribute an executable that uses a > shell script as its entry point, but does not require a cygwin > installation on the host. This is off-topic, but you may be more interested in native ports of the GNU tools, such as <http://unxutils.sourceforge.net/> or <http://gnuwin32.sourceforge.net/>. They are designed to be standalone, and don't depend on a Cygwin environment. Of course they might not work quite the same as some functionality is likely missing. Brian -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |