Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From:	Andrew Schulman <andrex AT alumni DOT utexas DOT net>
Subject:	Re: ssh-add hangers -- please try the latest snapshot
Date:	Thu, 10 Mar 2005 10:24:54 -0500
Lines:	11
Message-ID:	<MPG.1c9a30cf17b9a7c39896d1@localhost>
References:	<BAY19-F11B164791815E3BCCD664AB5520 AT phx DOT gbl>
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-Complaints-To:	usenet AT sea DOT gmane DOT org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host:	pcp04399769pcs.nrockv01.md.comcast.net
User-Agent:	MicroPlanet-Gravity/2.70.2067
X-Archive:	encrypt
X-Gmane-MailScanner:	Found to be clean
X-Gmane-MailScanner:	Found to be clean
X-Gmane-MailScanner-SpamScore:	s
X-MailScanner-From:	goc-cygwin AT m DOT gmane DOT org
X-MailScanner-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-IsSubscribed:	yes

> Hi All...
> 
> With the latest snapshot, I can not see the problem now.
> 
> It also seemd to take a long time sometimes with the previous snapshot 
> (March 4) in ssh-add. That also seems better now. But I really don't have 
> enough data to say much here...it just seems better.

You're right-- after the first invocation, ssh-add would work, but 
strace showed that the troublesome call would take about 1 s to return.  
That time is now < 1 ms.


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -